The Queensland government promised to put victims first, but it buried a report from domestic violence survivors

A leaked document from a panel of survivors strongly criticises police handling of family violence and asks for civilian oversight.

The Queensland government promised to put victims first, but it buried a report from domestic violence survivors

The Queensland government has not released an important report from a group of people who have experienced domestic violence. This group was asked to help improve how the government deals with these issues. However, their report was very critical of the police and suggested a new way for people to complain about police actions.

The government had said it would make sure victims were the main focus of its justice policies. They created a special panel with people who had lived experience of domestic, family, and sexual violence. This panel was supposed to find problems in the system and suggest changes.

The panel finished its work in December, but the government has not shared its recommendations. When asked to release the report, the minister's office refused. The Guardian newspaper has seen a copy of the report, which was intended for wider sharing.

People involved in the panel feel they cannot talk about it publicly. One person said anonymously that promises to be tough on crime and support victims mean little if they are not followed by real action. Some believe the government is hiding the report because it strongly criticises the police and asks for independent checks on their actions.

The report mentioned that police responses to domestic violence were inconsistent and sometimes showed a lack of understanding or negative attitudes. It also noted delays in police responses and that some officers did not treat breaches of protection orders seriously enough. The report suggested that officers' personal judgments sometimes affected how cases were handled, leading to unfair treatment for victims.


Vocabulary

critical — saying that something or someone is bad or wrong.
oversight — the careful watching of something or someone.
prioritise — to give attention or resources to something considered more important than other things.
panel — a group of people chosen to give advice or make a decision.
recommendations — suggestions or advice about the best thing to do.
anonymously — without giving your name.
inconsistent — not staying the same throughout; different each time.
breaches — failures to keep an agreement or follow a rule or law.

Discussion Questions

  1. What was the main criticism of the police in the survivors' report?
  2. Why do some people think the government decided not to release the report?
  3. The government promised to prioritise victims. Do you think they are doing enough to support them based on this news story?

Based on an article from The Guardian.

Read the original article