Don't let Jodrell Bank Observatory become another industrial museum

For many years, Jodrell Bank Observatory has been a source of inspiration and pride. Sir Bernard Lovell's incredible creation, which combines advanced space exploration with impressive engineering, never fails to impress. Visiting the visitor centre with my grandchildren showed me that this feeling of wonder is being passed on to younger generations.

It's true that Jodrell Bank could become another fine museum. However, in the north of England, we already have many museums dedicated to our significant industrial past. We only have one Jodrell Bank, which is currently exploring the mysteries of the universe. Therefore, it is up to my fellow English graduate, Andy Burnham, to overturn the shortsighted decision made by UK Research and Innovation. He should remember his favourite poet Philip Larkin's concerns about the UK's future, which suggested that future generations might only inherit money instead of a vibrant country.

Britain still holds a leading position globally in science and technology. Evidence of this includes the number of Nobel prize winners, the success of startups funded and then acquired by large international companies, and the ability of our universities and research facilities to attract talented individuals from around the world. When British trade delegations visit other countries, science and technology are highlighted as key strengths. It seems unusual, therefore, that government investment in this area, which contributes to the nation's international influence, is being reduced.

The large radio telescope at Jodrell Bank is a symbol of Britain's excellence in science. Many people, both in Britain and internationally, have seen it as a backdrop to stories about space travel and significant astronomical discoveries. Decreasing its funding will highlight the declining state of scientific efforts in Britain and a lack of ambition to maintain the country's position as a global leader. If the government intends to reduce spending on scientific research discreetly, turning Jodrell Bank into a museum is not the best approach. The annual cost of £2.8m seems like a small price to pay to maintain an international symbol of Britain's scientific achievements.

I am very disappointed to hear that Jodrell Bank Observatory is under threat. I recently had an informative day at the visitor centre and was planning to visit again. I would like to suggest that the responsible funding body take a closer look at the future of British science and at the young people who aspire to careers in science, engineering, and technology.